On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Anthony Hannan wrote:

> > What was wrong with Andreas' suggestion that ContextTag be a package that
> > could be loaded by those that need correct stack copying, but not part of
> > the base enhancements?
>
> Then you could never load more than one enhancement that uses the receiverMap
> at the same time.  Adding a ContextExtension record allows us to load as many
> as we want (or for a single enhancement to utilize more than one slot).

Ok, but that doesn't mean you can't make ContextTag be an optional package
- if you put ContextExtension hooks into the base for it to use, great.