SUnit Test Failure on fresh Image - Win32
Marcus Denker
marcus at ira.uka.de
Sat Mar 1 11:43:54 UTC 2003
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 11:31:10AM +0100, Hannes Hirzel wrote:
> You are right Marcus. It is here
> http://swiki.gsug.org:8080/sqfixes/3015.html.
>
> I remember now that Diego was asking us to test it. I have actually been
> using
> it for 12 days now and it works fine.
>
> Any other test experiences?
>
> Diego says that he will create a SqueakMap entry after it has been
> tested.
>
I don't think there's any need to not add un-tested stuff to SqueakMap:
That's why you can say it's alpha.
So we should add this right now, and I vote for, at least, two packages:
-> Sunit 3.0 removal
(This will be added to the update-stream of 3.5 ASAP)
-> SUnit 3.1
This should be a SAR-File containing the original sources, right
as they are generated with Rosetta.
These changesets should be bundelt using SAR.
(Maybe it would make sense to have two packages: SUnit-3.1 and
Sunit-3.1-Tests. Tests should be in seperate packages, allways)
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker marcus at ira.uka.de -- Squeak! http://squeak.de
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|