"Richard A. O'Keefe" <ok at cs.otago.ac.nz> wrote:

> But what Bag>>union: does and whether #union: should be in Collection
> at all are design issues that deserve wider debate and probably can't
> be changed without breaking someone's code.  We don't have to settle
> such matters before fixing an obvious bug.

Another solution is to move #, higher in the collection hierarchy.  In fact,
you wouldn't even need #union: any longer.


-Lex