[Q] literals of a methods

Alexandre Bergel bergel at iam.unibe.ch
Tue Mar 4 00:32:21 UTC 2003


Hello,

I am wondering why the following expression is false.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
nil class compile: 'foobar Object new asMorph'.
(nil class >> #foobar) literals includesAllOf: #(new asMorph)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

If anyone could help me to make a light on this point...

Cheers,
Alexandre

-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Bergel Alexandre  http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~bergel
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list