Mythical small kernel images?
Alejandro F. Reimondo
aleReimondo at smalltalking.net
Wed Mar 5 17:47:19 UTC 2003
Hi,
> Do you have any architecture documents I could see? Working through code
> is good, but some understanding of your _intent_ would be very helpful.
> For example, I don't really see what you intend with the .bigbang files
> and all the includes of other bigbang and chachara files.
Please take the chachara and bigBang files as simple literal examples
to know the minimum set of objects can conform a Squeak image.
They are simply chunk formated source files.
Ale.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Rowledge" <tim at sumeru.stanford.edu>
To: <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: Mythical small kernel images?
> Hi Ale.,
> I've managed to make an image, though it seems to have a mutual
> recursion somewhere between print and printf:, but I'll work that out
> soon.
>
> Do you have any architecture documents I could see? Working through code
> is good, but some understanding of your _intent_ would be very helpful.
> For example, I don't really see what you intend with the .bigbang files
> and all the includes of other bigbang and chachara files.
>
> Oh, and is it ok with you if I mention to Jon Hylands the stuff you've
> done for remote debugging? It could certainly help him, and would mean
> I could concentrate on the core parts.
>
> tim
>
> --
> Tim Rowledge, tim at sumeru.stanford.edu, http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim
> If you think nobody cares about you, try missing a couple of payments.
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|