ClassBuilder fix, SqueakMap, and releasing 3.4
Brent Vukmer
bvukmer at blackboard.com
Thu Mar 6 19:21:33 UTC 2003
I agree so heartily, I spent a decent amount of time creating some initial core-packages pages on the Swiki!
Please review them when you get the chance.
-----Original Message-----
From: Colin Putney [mailto:cputney at whistler.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 2:18 PM
To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
Subject: Re: ClassBuilder fix, SqueakMap, and releasing 3.4
On Thursday, March 6, 2003, at 09:57 AM, Brent Vukmer wrote:
> Colin --
>
> I don't think that's an argument for not registering
> packages-that-aren't-quite-packages-yet. Instead, it's an argument to
> enhance PackageLoader so that if filters the list to hide PTAQPY's by
> default.
Ok, so then we'd have a package in the SM database that's neither
installable nor visible in the list. How does that help us?
Now, I love SqueakMap as much as the next guy. But let's not go
overboard here. SM is a catalog for packages that are not in the image.
It provides a way to easily find and load these packages. It's *not* a
registry of Squeak development efforts. That's what the Swiki is for.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|