I'm sure it does work. How different is the plugin from 3.4 final? I
know I'd want somebody to actually test this in 3.5 before Doug adds the
update. 

I don't know why everybody's whining. I find the tags perfectly easy to
recall ;-)

ET - externally tested
ER - externally reviewed
SM - Small
SL - SLint output reviewed, incorporated when relevant
CD - precise changes documented.
SU - is properly covered by SUnit tests, which are green

In this case, since we're talking about a small change that's actually a
roll back, and has been explained perfectly clearly by yourself, testing
3.4 compatibility is probably the only relevant concern.

Daniel

Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
> > Sure. IIUC, MichaelR posted it to the SqF list. Have a look 
> > at it, test drive it on 3.5, and post it with QA tags to squeak-dev.
> 
> If I could only remember those tags, er ... um ... what was it? The fix Mike
> posted has been tested for a couple of months in the Squeakland plugin and
> works quite nicely.
> 
> Cheers,
>   - Andreas
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org 
> > [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On 
> > Behalf Of Daniel Vainsencher
> > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 8:38 AM
> > To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
> > Subject: Re: [BUG] publishing project locally from SqueakPlugin
> > 
> > 
> > Sure. IIUC, MichaelR posted it to the SqF list. Have a look 
> > at it, test
> > drive it on 3.5, and post it with QA tags to squeak-dev.
> > 
> > This is the best way to endorse anything as fitting for the 
> > nearest release.
> > 
> > Daniel
> > 
> > Bert Freudenberg <bert at isg.cs.uni-magdeburg.de> wrote:
> > > Yes, it's a known problem. It has been fixed in the image at 
> > > squeakland.org, which is more end-user oriented than the 
> > developer stuff 
> > > at squeak.org.
> > > 
> > > Squeak Guides, can we get this fix into the regular update 
> > stream ASAP? 
> > > 
> > > -- Bert
> >