Daniel Vainsencher <danielv at netvision.net.il> wrote:
[SNIP]
> PS - if you want to make a lot of changes to Celeste, then it might be a
> good idea to talk about them, since Lex, I think, will want to coevolve
> his FilteringCeleste stuff with it, and I want to package up and improve
> TimOlsons Bayesian Spam Filter (wonderful stuff, but saving it is too
> slow when you use it for more than a couple of months. I want to speed
> it by a factor of 10, or make it constant time). I also want to slowly

You did apply his fix right? He used Bag>>size inside a loop. Bad idea.
I haven't profiled it yet but without that fix it got deadly slow.
The hacks to get it to work with FilteringCeleste was easy.
Hmmm, I need to do a list of things I would like to change/fix in
Celeste...

regards, Göran