On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 08:08:36AM -0500, Gary Fisher wrote:
> 
> The article's title is perhaps a bit unfortunate; the "Post-OOP Paradigm,"
> according to the article, "do[es] not aim to supplant object-oriented
> programming [but to] refine or improve or reinvigorate it."  Post-OOP, in
> the author's sense, appears to mean "now that OOP is recognized as the
> baseline," not "in place of" but "built upon."
> 

It's a buzzword, much like "postmodernism". Once X becomes popular amongst
the hoi polloi, X's early adopters are eager to become "post-X", to
reassert their avant-garde-ness.

--
Jeff Read <bitwize at snet.net>
If God wrote in LISP code, then Jesus wrote in
Smalltalk, hence, water become: wine.