I wouldn't assume anything, based upon one contact, and particularly 
with respect to the statement below, which applies only to Apple's 
active projects, of which Squeak is not one.

On Friday, March 14, 2003, at 11:26 AM, Cees de Groot wrote:

> On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 17:13, Jack Johnson wrote:
>> If so, maybe it wouldn't be hard to convince Apple to simplify their 
>> IP
>> management by rolling over their Squeak contribution into an APSL
>> license.  Easier for them, easier for their lawyers, easier for us?
>>
> Apple - at least my contact - already closed that door. They apply APSL
> only to their active projects.
> <signature.asc>