On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 06:11, William Cole wrote:
>  If I do not assert my right of 
> unreasonable search and seizure, then the search and its results are 
> considered legal, even if afterwards I decide that the cops went 
> overboard. 
I'm glad I live in a civilized country where this doesn't hold. I really
wonder whether it holds in the USA

> Now look at "assertion" in Business Law.  If I am the copyright holder of 
> the name "McDonalds", and someone opens a competing establishment of the 
> same name, I am required to legally enforce my copyright if I wish it to 
> remain in-force. 

You are mixing up copyright and trade mark law here. Trademarks need to
be asserted, copyrights - to the best of my knowledge - not. 

And I don't follow your arguments why the Squeak-L should, from its
wording alone, not be a valid license. That's completely new to me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20030315/371b2bdf/attachment.pgp