On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 11:56, Andreas Raab wrote:
> Interesting idea in fact. This might work (but only a lawyer can tell you).
> What would be good about this were that the new license could be a little
> less "Apple centric" in its verbage. The new license could actually exclude
> the font clause given that no Apple fonts were in the release.
> 
I've started work on that a while ago (I can post an interim result if
there's interest). However, the tricky bit is 'no less protective of
Apple's rights' combined with the clause on indemnification on
distribution - the stuff that convinced Debian that they didn't want to
distribute Squeak. Most of the other problematic clauses (including the
font clause, with or without replacement of fonts) can be stricken, I
think. 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20030326/abf12840/attachment.pgp