Yoshiki,

What is stopping you from running the scripts on a 3.4 system and
working on that?

Can you elaborate a little on what the significance of that 3.2 image
is? It might be easier to move that content forward than to find and fix
the problem in the 3.2 code.

If that is impractical, could you elaborate on what exactly doesn't
work? if it causes a walk back, a bug report from the debugger might
help someone spot the problem.

Daniel

Yoshiki.Ohshima at acm.org wrote:
>   Daniel,
> 
>   Thank you for your suggestion.  The issue is that the trick from
> Andreas doesn't work (for me) in 3.2 image that the current m17n
> effort is based on.
> 
>   If someone is willing to scan all the changes from 3.2 to 3.4 and
> resolve the conflict with the m17n scripts, that would be great.
> 
> -- Yoshiki