What we want with Squeak?
Jay Carlson
nop at nop.com
Tue May 6 17:10:06 UTC 2003
"Daniel Vainsencher" <danielv at netvision.net.il> writes:
> * If you tolerate this (cruft) then your children will be next
> Even now, the image, from a software engineering perspective, is a mess.
> Object (The Base Object) indirectly depends on well over half the
> classes in the system. This is why it is hard to make images for
> specific purposes - because everything depends on everything else.,
> because there are not module limits.
In a system that encourages code browsing as a documentation and exploration
strategy, this is particularly painful.
Object and Morph are important classes. I wish it was easier for me to read
them and understand them.
Jay
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|