Convincing a harvester (was on SqF list)
Stephane Ducasse
ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Wed May 7 06:41:40 UTC 2003
Hi cees
I think that when a group of people works together we have a better
chance to get good result because everybody is doing mistake, me the
first.
Now I would not like that everything gets automatically accepted before
we have serious tests
to check that people are not breaking what other are doing. A simple
example is all the code that I'm moving away from SystemDictionary. I
would really hate that a new changeset breaks the layers we are
fighting to build.
So we should make the distinction. I think that having tests would be
the best way of detecting that kind of situation.
Stef
On Wednesday, May 7, 2003, at 12:08 AM, Cees de Groot wrote:
> We probably want different rules for different times: alpha accepts
> mostly anything (or maybe mostly anything after the first patch by an
> author), beta needs X amount of review, gamma needs Y amount of review,
> and released needs Z amount of review, where presumable X < Y < Z.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|