What we want with Squeak?

Cees de Groot cg at cdegroot.com
Wed May 7 11:36:08 UTC 2003


On Wed, 2003-05-07 at 13:56, Sean Charles wrote:
> To *win over* newcomers then, I think that a massive, bloated, 
> splitting-at-the-seams image is how it should be, and currently is.

Please tell me where you read that we will *not* supply a full image
anymore. In fact, I think in the course of this discussion, it has been
mentioned at least 6 times that the full image *will* be available. It
helps to read a thread before you step in with a rant.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20030507/0e2dda15/attachment.pgp


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list