[Q] MCP vs. Removals - The Conflict
goran.krampe at bluefish.se
goran.krampe at bluefish.se
Fri May 9 07:37:35 UTC 2003
Julian Fitzell <julian at beta4.com> wrote:
> goran.krampe at bluefish.se wrote:
> > <diegogomezdeck at consultar.com> wrote:
> >>One obvious but notSooGood solution is to create a small piece of code that
> >>remove from out changes all the modifications we made to the just-removed
> >>classes. The dark point with these aproach is we'll lose a lot of cleaning.
> >
> > But wait - shouldn't your changes simply be routed to the maintainer of
> > said packages?
> > Then they can update their packages and the rest is released on the
> > update stream.
>
> Yes, presumably if you file in the replacement package with DVS, then
> any changes you make will go to those packages and then you can send
> diffs of the DVS packages to the maintainers.
Right! If they use DVS of course. But that's true - sounds rather easy.
As it should be.
> Julian
regards, Göran
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|