copy yourself ?

jan ziak ziakjan at host.sk
Thu May 22 23:01:57 UTC 2003


On Thu, 22 May 2003 22:52:06 +0200, Chris Burkert wrote
>
> But this wouldn't be 'objectoriented' in it's definition. Remember 
> that the objectoriented way is not an exact simulation of the real 
> world (but it comes close to it).
>

of course.
 
> Maybe you should take a look at 'functional programming'.

why?

> 
> Not everything in the world is objectoriented and not everything is 
> functional ... you have to decide for each problem what would be the 
> 'best' environment to solve it.
> 
> Regards
>             Chris Burkert
> 
> PS: Smalltalk is still my favourite language for solving problems!!!
> -- 
> http://www.chrisburkert.de/






More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list