Thinking about redoing Morphic (Naked Objects and MorphicWrappers ).

Stephane Ducasse ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Thu May 29 08:03:42 UTC 2003


Hi todd

We are evaluating how to build another browser. Is the status of Bricks 
good to support that or this is too
young? Would you use Bricks for doing that? What kind of widgets do you 
support? I did not have the time yet to
look at it :((

Stef



On Wednesday, May 28, 2003, at 10:46 PM, tblanchard at mac.com wrote:

> Brick is what MinimalProtoMorph grew into - all the code stealing code 
> is still there.
> I've got a new version with color well support (drag and drop 
> backgrounds) done and gradient color editor support in the works...
>
> On Wednesday, May 28, 2003, at 09:44  AM, Brent Vukmer wrote:
>
>> Hey Todd -- is this the last version of MinimalProtoMorph that you 
>> did?
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: tblanchard at mac.com [mailto:tblanchard at mac.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:31 PM
>>> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
>>> Subject: Re: Thinking about redoing Morphic (Naked Objects
>>> and MorphicWrappers ).
>>>
>>>
>>> Wondering what makes a minimal morph - created a class
>>> ProtoMorph that
>>> dynamically steal missing code from Morph.  Load it up and treat it
>>> like a Morph - then see what code it took to do that.
>>>
>>> Might be useful.
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list