Stephen Pair wrote:
> ducasse wrote:
> 
>>>>
>>>
>>> That is encouraging (more than the comments in the package header on
>>> Squeakmap!)
>>
>>
>> chris could you be explicit about the difference between 
>> SmallWiki/Squeak and SmallWiki/VW in the package on Squeak Map because 
>> it would be bad that people think that SmallWiki in general is bad. 
> 
> 
> 
> Stef,
> 
> I had a quick look at it and in general it is not stable yet...it looks 
> to me like they are just VW vs Squeak differences that need to be ironed 
> out.  For example, I don't think any of the persistence backends are 
> working (just in memory storage).
> 
> But, the package clearly states that the port is full of bugs right 
> now...so I don't think anyone will think SmallWiki is bad...just that 
> the port is not yet finished.

Exactly ... would be a nice feature in Squeakmap to only display 
the stable packages per default.

Regards
            Chris Burkert
-- 
http://www.chrisburkert.de/