ok thanks for the info. I do not have anytime to play with it.
and would like to concentrate on one version.

Stef

On Jeudi, nov 6, 2003, at 19:02 Europe/Zurich, Stephen Pair wrote:

> ducasse wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>
>>> That is encouraging (more than the comments in the package header on
>>> Squeakmap!)
>>
>> chris could you be explicit about the difference between 
>> SmallWiki/Squeak and SmallWiki/VW in the package on Squeak Map 
>> because it would be bad that people think that SmallWiki in general 
>> is bad.
>
>
> Stef,
>
> I had a quick look at it and in general it is not stable yet...it 
> looks to me like they are just VW vs Squeak differences that need to 
> be ironed out.  For example, I don't think any of the persistence 
> backends are working (just in memory storage).
>
> But, the package clearly states that the port is full of bugs right 
> now...so I don't think anyone will think SmallWiki is bad...just that 
> the port is not yet finished.
>
> - Stephen
>
>