Harvesting classes without class comments?!

ducasse ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Thu Nov 6 19:54:51 UTC 2003


Thanks scott I was not aware that we could invoke that directly. This 
is true that we should run these checks in the future

Stef

On Jeudi, nov 6, 2003, at 20:00 Europe/Zurich, Scott Wallace wrote:

> Most squeakers are probably familiar with the simple 
> change-set-checking tools that have been available via the "Dual 
> Change Sorter" for years, but for those who are not...
>
> When preparing a change-set for publication, and also when vetting 
> someone else's change-set for harvesting, you can point a 
> DualChangeSorter at the change-set, and then bring up (and *keep up* 
> with the push-pin) the "more..." branch of the change-set-list menu:
>
>           <image.tiff>
>
>
> The five "check for" items allow you to explore potential deficiencies 
> in the change-set; they detect "slips" (e.g. halts and Transcript 
> references,) messages that have no senders, uncommented methods, 
> uncommented classes, and uncategorized methods.
>
> If it were agreed that no change-set would be considered a candidate 
> for harvesting until it had passed all these checks, it would help.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>   -- Scott
>
>
> At 12:41 PM +0100 11/6/03, goran.krampe at bluefish.se wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> Just got a bit disappointed when I realized that several classes that
> have come into the image recently DO NOT HAVE CLASS COMMENTS.
>
> Why aren't you (other Harvesters) checking this? It is the first thing 
> I
>
> check, always. A bit annoyed.
>
>
>
> regards, G–ran
>
>
> <P58AB2A20_4>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 1454 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20031106/8560d541/attachment.bin


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list