I agree; SAR is the way to go for this sort of thing.

Mcz is a strictly declarative format, containing only snapshots and 
version info. The fact that it's also a zip file is an implementation 
detail; Monticello will ignore anything it doesn't expect to find.

Colin

On Nov 8, 2003, at 8:24 AM, Ned Konz wrote:

> On Saturday 08 November 2003 1:14 am, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
>
>> I want to make a new version of the RB that updates among things the
>> testing files. I was surprised to find that ever since moving to the 
>> MCZ
>> format, I haven't been distributing those files with the RB.
>>
>> Until then, I used DVS and SARs to include the files in the zip. So is
>> there a meaningful way to include extra files in an .mcz? is this 
>> simply
>> a bad idea, and in that case what's the reasonable workaround?
>
> You can include the .mcz file in a SAR; this works well.
>
> -- 
> Ned Konz
> http://bike-nomad.com
> GPG key ID: BEEA7EFE
>
>