Unicode support (File names was Re: Warning: Large Babel
translation)
Lex Spoon
lex at cc.gatech.edu
Thu Nov 20 04:58:19 UTC 2003
> >
> > It will, but it will anyway if you choose an internal representaion
> > other than today's String, which you will need to do anyway.
>
> This may require a bit more clarification... I don't know what is
> in that 90MB image, but if you rewrite your code a bit, probably
> changing the test against "String" to "AbstractString" your code may
> well work fine (or maybe not.) Even for that kind of meta-level
> program, the change should be pretty small.
>
> I actually don't understand what you meant by "stops loading,"
> though. Are you worrying about the image won't run on a (new) VM?
> Then, you really don't have to worry about it.
>
I don't understand, then. What happens if the VM says "This VM uses
encoding timbuktu-3-rot11" and my image doesn't know about this
encoding? I thought the proposal was that the VM specifies a character
encoding to use, and the image is expected to support that encoding.
Lex
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|