Ned Konz wrote:

>On Thursday 20 November 2003 2:40 pm, Michael Rueger wrote:
>  
>
>>Dan Ingalls wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Oh, yes.  I'm using a fully updated 3.6
>>>      
>>>
>>I think in 3.6 there are still some bugs in the network rewrite left
>>addressed with a couple of updates in the 3.7 stream.
>>Which suggests we should publish those updates for 3.6 as well?
>>
>>Guides?
>>    
>>
>
>That could be a good idea, but I think in Dan's case it's problems with the 
>FileList. I tried the same transfer (using the RemoteFileStream itself, not 
>the FileList) in 3.6 and it was just as fast.
>

Do you think your FileList fixes would be worth adding as a patch to 
3.6?  If they are very simple and have proven to be stable so far in 
3.7alpha, it might be worth it.

Also, there are the "Dummy Babel" 3.6 patches which Diego posted which 
sound like a good idea, so we could release them at the same time.  (And 
maybe informally call the patched release "3.6.1", but it doesn't 
necessarily need to be a formal SystemVersion name.)

Anyway, perhaps Dan should try his slow ftp operations in the FileList 
with 3.7alpha, just to verify that it's faster in 3.7.

- Doug