Idea: "Timeout" submissions?
Marcus Denker
marcus at ira.uka.de
Thu Oct 2 16:44:49 UTC 2003
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:10:46PM +0300, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
> Let me be blunt, but don't take it personally -
> Did you review/test a fix by someone else?
> If not, why do you think it reasonable to expect that your fixes in turn
> will be reviewed in a timely fashion? If most people don't help, the
> rate of work getting done is slow.
>
And, uhm, just in case:
helping to get stuff harvested can be really simple: The trivial
things suck in the most time. e.g.
-> amzingly many people havn't yet found the "mail to list"
feature of the changesorter. So the harvesters burn losts
of time to resend stuff as proper, gzip-compressed changsets.
Anyone can help here!
-> Testing. Just a [et] "I filed this in and it did what it
claimed".
-> Say you opinion. There's lots of stuff to work on. If you
actually use something, tell so. If you want it included,
yell...
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker marcus at ira.uka.de -- Squeak! http://squeak.de
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|