[Special Report] 3.6 is out, now what? :-)
goran.krampe at bluefish.se
goran.krampe at bluefish.se
Wed Oct 8 21:17:50 UTC 2003
Daniel Vainsencher <danielv at netvision.net.il> wrote:
> I would like to add as a goal to have m17n in 3.7. I don't know where it
> stands exactly right now, and we might need a transition plan that takes
> more than one release, but I think we should try to at least start this
> release.
>
> BTW, the SmaCC MIT relicense doesn't yet solve all of the license issues
> with Anthonys parser, but it solves the big ones. We still need a
> relicense of the RB, at least as far as the parse nodes go, and Anthony
> to relicense his work. But I do believe we should be able to achieve
> this in 3.7.
>
> Daniel
I agree - m17n I also left out for someone else to put forward - partly
because I don't know its status either. :-) And the parse node issue etc
sounds - as you say - solvable.
regards, Göran
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|