On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Andreas Raab wrote:

> > But the fresh 3.6 image, of course, hasn't been built up from
> > installing packages (unless you mean the Full image).
>
> Which, of course, I do.
>
> > So there was never a chance to record this info.
> > We could, of course, simply release a changeset to the
> > update stream that creates whatever PackageInfo instances
> > we want...
>
> I think we should do this and fix the affected installers not to throw
> PackageInfo away.

Ok, so which packages does Full actually include, and what format are they
in?  Do we actually have PackageInfo data for them?