Hi ned

I have the impression that I approved the previous version already. :)
So we should really think how to proceed because I think that it would 
be easier if you and andreas
just are approving pairwise your morphic related submissions.


Stef
On Vendredi, oct 17, 2003, at 00:04 Europe/Zurich, Ned Konz wrote:

> from preamble:
>
> "Change Set:		MorphRemoval-ar-nk
> Date:			16 October 2003
> Author:			Andreas Raab
> 				Ned Konz
>
> 16 October (v6) (Ned Konz):
> Added removedMorph: notifications to removeAllMorphs and
> removeAllMorphsIn:
>
> 11 October (Ned Konz):
> Restored Genie focus termination logic.
> (v5): fixed reverse test that was making invalidation problems (should
> remember not to make last-minute changes!!)
>
> 23 September (Ned Konz):
> Fixed problem with extra #noteNewOwner: notifications.
> Fixed problem with addMorph: variants when adding morphs that already
> are in submorphs.
>
> This change set fixes various of the issues for getting proper
> notifications when adding or removing morphs. What it does:
> * Morph>>removeMorph: has been added as a public method to remove a
> submorph from some parent (why wasn't this there before???).
> * Morph>>privateRemove: just removes the morph from its submorphs and 
> is
> NOT intended for casual use (that's what we have #removeMorph: for).
> * Morph>>addedMorph: and Morph>>removedMorph: have been introduced for
> clients which need to know about adding/removing morphs
> * Morph>>addAll: and friends have been updated to adhere to the new
> protocols while preserving their optimized implementations.
> * Various places have been fixed to use #removeMorph: instead of
> #privateRemoveMorph: and to implement the #removedMorph: notification.
> * #privateRemoveMorph: as well as #addedOrRemovedSubmorph: have been
> deprecated.
> "!
> <MorphRemoval-ar-nk.6.cs.gz>