BlockContexts are very dependant on the context in which they were 
created.  We can refer to variables in that scope.  While you might be 
able to write out [1 + 1], how do you write out [foo + 1] ?  I have no 
idea what/if any the solutions for this are, but I'm pretty sure that's 
the reason it isn't done at the moment.  It's just not as simple as 
writing out the source code that was used when creating the block; the 
entire context at that point needs to be captured.

Julian

Markus Gaelli wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I wanted to get the store-string of say
> [1+1] , which should yield '[1 + 1]'.
> 
> Any reason why "BlockContext >> storeOn:" is not implemented?
> Can I go ahead and "just do it"?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Markus
> 
>