I don't think you're the first to be confused this way - maybe you can
think of wording improvements and be the last?

Daniel

Mike Roberts <mike at mjr104.co.uk> wrote:
> Because the error you get is "This block requires 0 arguments" and I think, no it doesn't it needs 1.  This is one of the newbie things I do all the time.  I think I now see that the intent of the error, had I read the method comment correctly, is that the block you have given doesn't expect any arguments.  I always read the error as you don't need any arguments for the operation, and you do, you need 1 - but only do: knows this.