Theoretically, fine, but the KCP page
(http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3257) lists changes 96-102, of which
98-101 are already included. So 
- I am wary of reviewing changes in a list that's obviously out of date,
and 
- it doesn't seem like 2 changesets is such a huge backlog anyway.

Anything I'm missing? not that I mind looking at a short list of
changes, if you feel bad about them going unreviewed. 

Daniel

ducasse <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
> Perfect for us. So may be we should ask daniel to go over the KCP items 
> left really soon. I will have more time in the near future and I want 
> to continue cleaning systemDictionary :) I have nearly extracted 
> SqueakImage from it.
> Daniel :) ??
> 
> 
> > - Doug
> >
> >
> >