Hi Aaron--

	It seems like very important constraints, namely memory
bandwidth/capacity, are not taken into account by your data. And
wouldn't be 256MB be somewhat spartan for the 1+ GHz machines you cited?
If you're going to venture off into provocative waters like
"sends/s/MHz", how about "sends/s/MHz/MB/Mbps" or somesuch? (Yes, it
gets exponentially provocative very quickly ;)

	The column I most enjoy watching is just sends/s. :)


-C

--
Craig Latta
http://netjam.org/resume
craig at netjam.org
[|] Proceed for Truth!