Well, I've done update map, seen 9, while another image had previously
had 13. So I was very sure there was a problem, but it sounds like I
won't see this this often. major.minor.micro might be easier to
understand, thought your scheme was probably not the source of my
problems...

Daniel

Avi Bryant <avi at beta4.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
> 
> > BTW, I've just upgraded from 13 to 9. Can Colin and you, for my sanity,
> > please keep the versions (at least in SM) monotonously rising?
> 
> We have been.  Current SM version is 13.  I believe 9 was the previous SM
> version.  Perhaps you had an old image that you hadn't updated the map in?