> Well, but there is still that strange feeling not knowing what the
> problem actually was. Very probably Avi is right and it was some race-
> condition in our application code. Or it could have been the buggy
> SharedQueue that we are using to pool our postgres-sockets. I was
> shocked when reading Nathanael's mail about those synchronisation bugs
> in it. Why is something like this in the base-image?
>
Hi lukas

because somebody should review it. So please have a look and tell us 
what you think
(I'm too bad in concurrent programming) but I agree with you, fix like 
that are IMPORTANT
because we should be able to trust the base image code.

Stef