Chris Muller wrote:

>
>So if the proposed solution only reduces, not eliminates name collisions, I
>suggest we consider doing the simplest thing that can possibly work.  NOTHING! 
>  
>

What if there was a very simple "solution" that did not eliminate the 
possibility, but instead just reduced it to, say, one chance in one 
trecentillion (10 to the 903 power-- see 
http://www.uni-bonn.de/~manfear/numbers_names.php).  Would that work?

If that was not good enough (one chance in 10^903), then why not?

And if it *was* good enough, what does that say about your statement above?

Nevin

-- 
Nevin Pratt

Bountiful Baby
http://www.bountifulbaby.com
The Most Complete Reborn Supply Store On The Web!

(801) 992-3137