[ENH] NewProgressBar (reviewed [er][et])

Alexander Lazarević Alexander at Lazarevic.de
Wed Apr 7 22:53:42 UTC 2004


Yoshiki,

Am Mittwoch, 7. April 2004 23:18 schrieb Yoshiki Ohshima:
> > do a quick benchmark and it took around 36 seconds to run with MVC
> > progress display and 30 seconds with the morphic variant. This is on
> > windows and 5868 image. (On my slower Linux machine I got 110s MVC and
> > 125s morphic). What did you test on what architecture?
>
>   It is Pentium-M 900MHz WinXP. I ran both in Morphic.  Hmm.  So, in
> your case, new one is faster than old one on a fast computer but
> slower on slow computer?

Ups, I swapped the linux values (I just checked again). It has to read 125s 
MVC and 110 morphic. Sorry for that.

Alex
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 155 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20040408/982b6ac3/attachment.pgp


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list