On Saturday 17 April 2004 12:00 pm, David T. Lewis wrote:
> Question for Ned: Is there any reason that
> DeferredActionStandardSystemController should not be merged into
> StandardSystemController? I cannot think of any reason that it would cause
> a problem or noticeably affect performance. I added a
> DeferredActionStandardSystemView for this change set just to keep things
> separated, but I think it would be better just to pull your deferred action
> mechanism into the standard class.

I think you're right; this would allow the same idiom for letting background 
processes communicate with either UI.

-- 
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com/squeak/