On Apr 30, 2004, at 1:38 AM, Michael Rueger wrote:

> Avi Bryant wrote:
>
>> all in code not bundled with the image.  So, can/should we rename it 
>> to avoid this conflict?  I'm proposing BasicHTTPRequest, to 
>> distinguish it from its subclasses PluginHTTPRequest and 
>> CachedHTTPRequest.  A changeset that does this renaming is attached.
>
> As I created these beasts a long time ago I would like to propose 
> HTTPDownloadRequest :-)
> The others could be renamed accordingly (PluginHTTPDownloadRequest, 
> CachedHTTPDownloadRequest).

Ok.  Revised changeset attached.  Since you're the original author, 
does that mean we can [approve] this?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: renameHTTPRequest-avi.2.cs.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 419 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20040430/a6f75e28/renameHTTPRequest-avi.2.cs.bin
-------------- next part --------------