Doug Way wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, August 7, 2004, at 04:39 PM, Ken Causey wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 2004-08-07 at 12:56, Doug Way wrote:
> >
> >> Actually, I've needed the same capability for moving an [approved]
> >> item
> >> back to Review status.  There are several groups under Approved right
> >> now (at the bottom of the list) that have some issue and should go
> >> back
> >> to Review.  We could probably also handle this with a [reopened] tag.
> >
> > Maybe we should just implement a set of tags that re-categorize a
> > group.  're-reviewed', 're-approved', 're-update', 're-unreviewed'?
> > That might be going overboard but you get the idea.
> 
> True, although I don't think we need re-approved and re-update.  If
> something goes back to review, then a simple [approved] or [update -
> xxxx] can still move it to Approved/Update.  (Even if it's the second
> time it's approved... it's the order that matters.)
> 
> I'm not sure we really need re-unreviewed, either.  (Although I
> wouldn't have a big problem with allowing it.)  Right now, everything
> in Unreviewed has had no discussion whatsoever, which would not really
> be true for something bumped back from a different status.
> 
> So if we're only left with 're-reviewed', we could just call it
> 'reopened'.  Although 're-reviewed' is okay with me too.

Reopen will move closed messages to review and re-review will move from 
approved to review tab ?
Sounds good to me
Karl