> Yes, we decided this sometime while in 3.7a. The idea is that Tests are 
> (or should be) a interesting form
> of documentation: If you need an example, look at the test.
> 

Hmm, so in Package Browser (maybe better name would be Category Browser) 
there are now items like "Text", "Exceptions" with just Tests inside. To 
me this seems making image more messy.

I was once thinking about idea to provide some kind of voting system. It 
could be a web application or it could be integrated into system 
browser. The idea is to provide for given class, protocol or method a 
voting results as what is others' opinion about destiny of specific 
item. For example, for classes/methods I was thinking about 
classification like: "basic stone of universe", "hard life without it", 
"too cool to miss", "goodie thing (go packaged)", "useful only sometimes 
(go packaged)" and so on to things being deprecated, obsolete, 
forgotten, etc. Another aspect would bear placement - it is "right in 
place", "doesn't fit well", "inappropriate position" and so on.

However, now I see that squeak tend towards "append-only" system, so I'm 
silentely forgetting above. Maybe more anticipated thing would be 
presence of special classes (now 'class' is rather legacy world) for 
storing resources: rich texts, images, sounds, videos etc.

I must admit that it takes time to convince myself just not to care 
what's in the image. Taken that the best way to deliver a good thing to 
final user is to only copy programmer's disk, makes world much simplier..

-- 
Kamil