Set>>add: should ignore nil argument

Ned Konz ned at bike-nomad.com
Fri Aug 13 13:05:37 UTC 2004


On Friday 13 August 2004 3:38 am, radoslav hodnicak wrote:
> And I prefer having not correct, but compatible implementation to having
> not correct, but incompatible implementation.

I suspect that many applications and people would prefer a correct but 
incompatible solution, since they will never see another Smalltalk.

It really depends on what you're doing, no?
-- 
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list