Set>>add: should ignore nil argument
Ned Konz
ned at bike-nomad.com
Fri Aug 13 13:05:37 UTC 2004
On Friday 13 August 2004 3:38 am, radoslav hodnicak wrote:
> And I prefer having not correct, but compatible implementation to having
> not correct, but incompatible implementation.
I suspect that many applications and people would prefer a correct but
incompatible solution, since they will never see another Smalltalk.
It really depends on what you're doing, no?
--
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|