Set>>add: should ignore nil argument

Jason Rogers jason.rogers at riskmetrics.com
Fri Aug 13 11:23:41 UTC 2004


On Friday 13 August 2004 01:05 pm, Ned Konz wrote:
> On Friday 13 August 2004 3:38 am, radoslav hodnicak wrote:
> > And I prefer having not correct, but compatible implementation to having
> > not correct, but incompatible implementation.
>
> I suspect that many applications and people would prefer a correct but
> incompatible solution, since they will never see another Smalltalk.
>
> It really depends on what you're doing, no?

I vote for correct-but-incompatible.  I see no sense in continuing to do 
something just because we have always done it that way, even though we know 
it is wrong.

-- 
Jason Rogers
117 N. First Street
Suite 90
Ann Arbor, MI 48104

Tel 734.302.7694
Fax 734.302.7694
Cel 734.846.5089



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list