Monticello documentacion (was: Re: VMMAker unloading)
Hernan Tylim
htylim at yahoo.com.ar
Tue Dec 14 02:00:33 UTC 2004
Hi Avi, Colin, I am curious.
I just skimed thru the "Known Issues" section and I didn't find any
mention to the problem of detecting class definition changes on classes
that are not part of the package.Did that change?
To be sure that I am being clear let me give you an example of what I am
referring to.
Lets suppose that I have a package named "WonderfulTool" and that the
package has its classes defined in a "WonderfulTool" class category.
This package also has methods extensions on Morph under the method
category "*WonderfulTool-overrides". The problem I have is that I need
for package WonderfulTool to add a new instance variable to Morph. Once
upon a time this wasn't possible. Did that change?
Thanks.
Regards,
Hernán
Colin Putney wrote:
> Tim Rowledge wrote:
>
>>>> http://www.wiresong.ca/Monticello/
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you - wow, actual documentation. Amazing! Intelligable even!
>>
>>
>> ...well, as far as it goes. Come on Colin/Avi, more, more!
>
>
> No, the docs aren't very complete. What were you looking for that
> wasn't covered?
>
> Colin
>
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|