fixes to squeakmap/squeakpeople packages

stéphane ducasse ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Wed Dec 15 10:41:58 UTC 2004


normally squeaksource is done exactly for what you are looking for but 
then people should use it.
Not your fault.

Stef
On 15 déc. 04, at 10:10, Ingo Hohmann wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I just downloaded Testbrowser into a 3.9a-6523 image, and updated the 
> calls to deprecated methods.
>
> Now, how do I proceed?
>
> Testbrowser is handled with monticello, so I could send an updated mcz 
> to one of the maintainers, but emailing an mcz for 3 changed methods 
> looks like overkill to me.
>
> I guess that I'm not the only/first one having done this, so I guess 
> much of this effort gets lost, it would be nice to have a central 
> point for managing thing like this, my ideas so far:
>
> - an "incoming" directory on squeaksource, where anyone can dump 
> updated packages, which will then be somehow forwarded to the package 
> provider.
>
> - a central "fixes" mailing list, which essentially does the same.
>
> Now you could argue, that it is easy enough to do as it is, but 
> history tells you that people are lazy as hell, so every additional 
> step stops some people from doing it.
>
>
> Ingo
>
>




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list