Ned Konz wrote:

>Still, parts 4.3 and 5.2 say (of General and Request headers):
>
>  Unrecognized header fields are treated as Entity-Header fields.
>
>And part 7.1 says (of Entity Header fields):
>
>  The extension-header mechanism allows additional Entity-Header fields
>   to be defined without changing the protocol, but these fields cannot
>   be assumed to be recognizable by the recipient. Unrecognized header
>   fields should be ignored by the recipient and forwarded by proxies.
>
>
>So by my reading of this, if the server doesn't recognize our Host: header as 
>being a valid HTTP/1.0 header, it should just ignore it.
>  
>
Yes, you're right.
I think the server is broken. Thanks for your help.