On December 17, 2004 11:25 am, Doug Way wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 00:30:48 -0500, "Milan Zimmermann"
>
> <milan.zimmermann at sympatico.ca> said:
> > Doug,
> >
<<snip>>
>
> In any case, the non-alphanumeric keys probably should be duplicated
> too, but I don't think it's a serious problem.  We could consider it a
> bug, but I still think we should go ahead with this changeset.

I agree, to me, this is great and should be used, thanks for working on it. I 
would not consider not duplicating the non-alphanumeric a bug .. I just 
wanted to point out how the non-alphanumeric combinations behave and whether 
it was intentional or not. (In fact I think it makes sense to only duplicate 
the alphanumeric. Leaves more room to implement such things as Ctrl-INS + 
Shift-INS :) )

>
> - Doug