[RANT] Come on people! ;)
Ned Konz
ned at squeakland.org
Wed Dec 22 04:23:45 UTC 2004
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 2:48 am, Stéphane Rollandin wrote:
> but this was not my point. my concern is: what are the stable parts of
> Squeak which I can securely build on ?
A partial answer might be: "those which people (possibly including yourself)
keep stable".
> examples of recent questions arising about parts of Squeak I'm using
> (and relying) on:
> BookMorphs - someone wanted to deprecate them for project (?)
> Morphic - will it be replace by Tweak ?
> Connectors - v1.9 don't load easily anymore and v2 is a complete
> rewrite which does not seem stable yet ?
I haven't put the changes from my work with Squeakland into the published v2
version. However, what instabilities have you found?
> Regexp - will the plugin version be maintained ?
It has been so far. It is being built with most or all of the VMs.
> etc. (there are others !).
>
> I'm developing a rather ambitious open source application for musical
> composition and I would like it to live a long life. it's very nice to
> see all this dynamic of experimentation taking place, but at the same
> time some strong and solid ground should be maintained to allow for the
> construction and long term maintenance of reliable applications on top
> of Squeak.
Would you like to grab a shovel and help maintain that solid ground?
--
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com/squeak/
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|