Avi Bryant <avi.bryant at gmail.com> wrote:
> All this means, I think, is prefixing
> Flow's classes so that they can coexist in the image with the old
> Stream implementation.  Yes, there's something aesthetically
> unpleasing about having FlowStream or FStream instead of just Stream,
> but if adoption is actually a goal it seems a small price to pay.

And of course my little Namespace mechanism would make it look nicer. :)

Still wondering btw why Stephane and the others didn't think my
Namespaces were any good.

regards, Göran