On 9 févr. 04, at 07:28, Julian Fitzell wrote:

> Hmm... how about we pick one and mark the other as deprecated - then  
> we can move towards *not* having two equivalent methods...
>
> I'd suggest one, but I don't think I really have any strong feeling in  
> either direction.  #withBlanksTrimmed seems more appropriate for  
> something that returns a new object rather than modifying the  
> receiver, but then String isn't consistent in this regard anyway and  
> #trimBlanks is shorter... :)

Yeap pick one and deprecate the other.

I imagine that it should also pass the tests I wrote.

Stef
>
> Julian
>
> Brent Vukmer wrote:
>> from preamble:
>> "Change Set:		String-trimBlanks-bkv
>> Date:			7 February 2004
>> Author:			Brent Vukmer <brentvukmer at yahoo.com>
>> v3 - now trimBlanks just calls withBlanksTrimmed.  :)  Not sure why
>> String defines two equivalent methods.  But withBlanksTrimmed as
>> currently defined appears to pass all of the tests that Lukas
>> supplied."!
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> --
>
>
>